Why SceneMixer publishes no notice period either
SceneMixer publishes no notice period. What it publishes instead is specificity: each price tier names its model and version, so a reader comparing two readings of the same page can see a swap after the fact. That is detection rather than warning, and the two are not interchangeable. From 2 source pages, read 2026-09-12 to 2026-10-26; no maker pays to be listed.
| What the page is asked | What SceneMixer publishes | What that leaves open |
|---|---|---|
| Is warning promised before a change | Nothing published about notice | Work in progress falls back to a listed tier, as a separate guide states |
| Can a change be detected afterwards | Yes, each tier names a model and a version | Detection needs two dated readings to work |
| Which tier moves the most work | The default is a named 480P line | A change there reaches untouched projects |
| Is the naming itself a commitment | No statement promises the naming continues | A page can stop naming models at any point |
Inclusion rule. Read from the public price list. A tier is counted as naming a model only where the model and its version appear beside the rate, not where a house label implies one. Order. What is promised first, then what can be observed instead.
1Detection and warning are different products
Every entry in this column publishes one or the other and nobody publishes both. A warning lets a production act before the change; detection lets it explain the change afterwards. Only the first prevents a season splitting across two looks.
Detection is still worth recording, because the alternative is an output difference nobody can attribute. A team that can point at a page and a date has a problem; a team that cannot has an argument about whether anything happened.
2Naming the version is what makes the reading possible
A tier called fast cannot be compared against anything. A tier that prints a model name and a version number can be checked against the maker's own notices, which is how a date published one layer up ever reaches the person paying for seconds.
That is the link the register is built to expose. The maker publishes a date, the app names the model, and a reader who has both can tell whether the date applies to the tier they are buying.
3The default is where the exposure concentrates
A tier nobody selects is where most delivered work comes from, so a change to the starting line reaches more finished material than a change to any other row. The register keeps that in the default tier column for that reason.
Nothing here promises the default stays put. What happens to a project started on it is described in a guide on withdrawn tiers: the episode keeps the tier it last used while that tier is listed, otherwise the default, at the price shown. The notice itself is still unpublished, which is why this reading is recorded as empty.
- Notice before a tier changesNo notice period published (as of 2026-09-12)nothing published
- Models carriedWan 3.0 at 480P, 720P and 1080P; Seedance 2.5 Pro, Lite and 480P; Seedance 2.0, Fast and 480P; MiniMax H3 and H3 Fast; Kling 4.0 and Kling 4.0 Flashnamed per tier
- Default tierWan 3.0 at 480Pwhat a new project gets
- Work in progress when a tier goesWhen a tier is withdrawn, text and image work falls back to the default tier and video to the tier the episode last used if it is still listed, otherwise the default; the price shown is the tier that will run
4Sources
Read from the price list on scenemixer.com, 2026-09-22. The whole entry is on SceneMixer, and the column it sits in is on Notice period. Same column, other entries: Runway, Sora.