Two generations sold together against one promoted
Both entries are model makers selling their own work, and they handle their back catalogues in opposite ways. One includes a previous generation as a plan benefit, so a production has somewhere to stand. The other promotes one generation and does not address what came before. From 2 source pages, read 2026-09-12 to 2026-09-22; no maker pays to be listed.
| On this point | Kling AI | Hailuo AI |
|---|---|---|
| Is an earlier generation named | Yes, as a plan benefit | Not stated on the page read |
| Is it reachable without extra cost | Yes, on the same membership | Unknown, because unaddressed |
| Is either marked as current | The newer pair is promoted | The promoted line is all there is |
| Is a successor described | Nothing describes a path | Nothing describes a path |
| What a production can plan | Finishing a block on the older line | Nothing beyond today's page |
Inclusion rule. Both cells on a row come from the maker's own public pages. A generation reachable behind a login but unnamed publicly does not fill a cell. Order. Whether an earlier generation is named first, then what that allows.
1A back catalogue on the price list is worth recording
Keeping a previous generation purchasable is the nearest thing to a migration policy that any application in this register offers. It lets a series finish where it started without anybody publishing a date.
It is also revocable by a page edit, which is why the register records it as a menu rather than as a commitment. The arrangement is real today and carries no statement about later.
2Silence about the previous version is a different cell
The other entry promotes a numbered generation, and numbered generations imply earlier ones existed. Nothing says whether they remain, so a production already working on one cannot tell from any public page whether it can finish.
That is recorded as not stated rather than as removed. Assuming they are gone would be as unfounded as assuming they remain, and the two assumptions lead to different plans.
3Neither describes a path forward
Having two generations on sale is not the same as saying the newer one is the successor to the older. Neither entry makes that statement, and neither says what happens to the oldest line when a third arrives.
Two hosting platforms in this register do publish sentences of that kind. Both sell to developers, which the notice question examines as a pattern rather than a coincidence.
4The same question, put to a third entry
| On this point | SceneMixer | Source |
|---|---|---|
| When a tier is withdrawn | When a tier is withdrawn, text and image work falls back to the default tier and video to the tier the episode last used if it is still listed, otherwise the default; the price shown is the tier that will run | SceneMixer, withdrawn tier guide |
Inclusion rule. SceneMixer's own statements that bear on the column this pair was chosen for. Order. The statement closest to the column first.
All of its readings are on the SceneMixer entry.
- Whether earlier Hailuo generations are still reachableNot stated (as of 2026-09-12)not stated
5Sources
Both readings come from the pages the entries publish themselves: Kling AI and Hailuo AI, read 2026-09-22. The column being compared is Named replacement. Other pairs: Luma and Vidu, fal and SceneMixer.