Two named lines, neither marked as the start
Two lines are named on the page, a current generation and a separate real-time model. Nothing marks either as what a new project runs on. Because the split is about speed rather than about version, a reader cannot even infer a default from which line is newer. As of 2026-09-22.
| What the page is asked | What Vidu publishes | What that leaves open |
|---|---|---|
| Is a starting tier stated | Not stated for either named line | Both appear as products, not as defaults |
| What separates the two lines | One is presented as a real-time model | A speed distinction, not a version one |
| Could the newer line be inferred | No, because neither is older | The split does not carry a sequence |
| Are earlier generations addressed | Not addressed on the page read | So the full menu is not visible either |
Inclusion rule. Filled when the entry's own public page says which model a new project starts on, or when a single-model menu makes the answer follow from the list having one line. Order. The absence first, then why it cannot be inferred.
1A speed split defeats the usual inference
On most pages a reader can guess the default by finding the newest line. Here the two named models differ in how fast a result arrives, so neither is the successor of the other and neither is obviously the starting point.
That makes the absence sharper than elsewhere in this column. There is no reasonable guess available, which is unusual: most unstated defaults can at least be narrowed to one candidate.
2Two products, two different exposures
A real-time model and a batch model are used for different work, so a change to either reaches a different set of projects. Without a stated default, a reader cannot tell which set is larger.
For a production that decides how much attention each line deserves. The register can record both names and cannot say which one most delivered work came from.
3The unaddressed earlier generations widen the gap
A numbered current generation implies lower numbers existed, and nothing says whether they are still selectable. So the published menu may not be the whole menu, and a default within it would not be a default within the product.
The succession reading for this entry records that silence directly. Both columns are describing the same missing sentence from different sides.
- Whether Q1 and Q2 are still offeredNo date announced (as of 2026-09-12)not stated
4Sources
Read from the home page on vidu.com, 2026-09-22. The whole entry is on Vidu, and the column it sits in is on Default tier. Same column, other entries: Kling AI, Luma.