LLMSwaps

Which model each app runs today, and when it last changed

Two house generations, and six makers behind the rest

Luma lists two of its own generations on the same plan table as licensed models from several other makers. Nothing marks any row as leaving and nothing names a successor. The plan describes itself as covering its own models alongside models from other makers, which is the closest the page comes to the question. As of 2026-09-22.

What has been announced, entry by entryFilled where the vendor has announced something in that column, hollow where it has not.What has been announced, entry by entryWhat Luma publishesWhat LumapublishesWhat that leaves openWhat that leavesopenIs a successor namedIs a successor named — What Luma publishes: No row names one on either halfIs a successor named — What that leaves open: House and licensed lines read identicallyAre two house generations soldAre two house generations sold — What Luma publishes: Yes, both appear on the plan tableAre two house generations sold — What that leaves open: A production on the older one is not pushedIs the licensed half distinguish…Is the licensed half distinguishedIs the licensed half distinguished — What Luma publishes: The plan wording mentions other makersIs the licensed half distinguished — What that leaves open: But individual rows are not marked as licensedWho ends a licensed rowWho ends a licensed row — What Luma publishes: Whoever makes that modelWho ends a licensed row — What that leaves open: Nothing describes how that news would arrive
Fig. 1 Filled where the vendor has announced something in that column, hollow where it has not.
What the plan table publishes about succession across its two halves. Recorded 2026-09-22.
What the page is askedWhat Luma publishesWhat that leaves open
Is a successor namedNo row names one on either halfHouse and licensed lines read identically
Are two house generations soldYes, both appear on the plan tableA production on the older one is not pushed
Is the licensed half distinguishedThe plan wording mentions other makersBut individual rows are not marked as licensed
Who ends a licensed rowWhoever makes that modelNothing describes how that news would arrive

Inclusion rule. Read from the plans and pricing page, including the sentence describing what a plan covers. Model names appearing only in product blog posts do not fill a cell. Order. The absence first, then the two halves of the table.

1One table, two kinds of risk

The house rows and the licensed rows fail differently. A house generation goes when this company decides; a licensed one goes when somebody else does, and the page gives a reader no way to tell which is which without already knowing the makers.

That undifferentiated presentation is the finding for this entry. A buyer comparing plans reads one menu; a production planning a season is exposed to several schedules and cannot see the seams.

One plan table, two kinds of endingHouse generations end when this company decides. Licensed rows end when their makers decide. The page presents both in the same type with no marking, so a reader has to already know which maker each name belongs to.A row disappears from the plan table. Who decided?It was a house generationThis companyOne schedule, and theseller is the party toask.It was a licensed lineAnother makerThe seller passed on adecision it did not make.You cannot tell from thepageThe ordinary caseNothing on the table markswhich half a row sits in.Why the register keeps maker pages apart from entry pages
Fig. 2 Undifferentiated presentation is the finding: one menu to a buyer, several schedules to a production.

2The plan wording is the nearest thing to a statement

The page describes a plan as covering this company's models alongside models from other makers. That is an acknowledgement that the menu is mixed, and it is not a commitment about any row on it.

Recorded plainly: the seller has told you the menu includes other people's work. Nothing follows from that about notice, succession or how long a particular licensed line stays purchasable.

3Two generations is a cushion with no stated depth

Having an older house line on sale gives a production somewhere to stand, the same arrangement recorded for Kling AI and LTX Studio. None of the three says how deep the cushion is.

Three entries reaching the same arrangement independently suggests it is a product habit rather than a policy anybody adopted. Habits change without announcements, which is why the column records them as menus.

  • Models carried
    Ray3.2 and Ray3.14 in house, plus Veo 3.1, three Kling entries, MiniMax H3 and three Seedance variantshouse and licensed on one tableLuma, plans and pricing / recorded 2026-09-22
  • How the plan describes the menu it sells
    Plans are described as covering Luma models alongside models from other makersLuma, plans and pricing / recorded 2026-09-22

4Sources

Read from the plans and pricing page on lumalabs.ai, 2026-09-22. The whole entry is on Luma, and the column it sits in is on Named replacement. Same column, other entries: Wan-AI, Pika.