Two house generations, and six makers behind the rest
Luma lists two of its own generations on the same plan table as licensed models from several other makers. Nothing marks any row as leaving and nothing names a successor. The plan describes itself as covering its own models alongside models from other makers, which is the closest the page comes to the question. From 1 source page, read 2026-09-22; no maker pays to be listed.
| What the page is asked | What Luma publishes | What that leaves open |
|---|---|---|
| Is a successor named | No row names one on either half | House and licensed lines read identically |
| Are two house generations sold | Yes, both appear on the plan table | A production on the older one is not pushed |
| Is the licensed half distinguished | The plan wording mentions other makers | But individual rows are not marked as licensed |
| Who ends a licensed row | Whoever makes that model | Nothing describes how that news would arrive |
Inclusion rule. Read from the plans and pricing page, including the sentence describing what a plan covers. Model names appearing only in product blog posts do not fill a cell. Order. The absence first, then the two halves of the table.
1One table, two kinds of risk
The house rows and the licensed rows fail differently. A house generation goes when this company decides; a licensed one goes when somebody else does, and the page gives a reader no way to tell which is which without already knowing the makers.
That undifferentiated presentation is the finding for this entry. A buyer comparing plans reads one menu; a production planning a season is exposed to several schedules and cannot see the seams.
2The plan wording is the nearest thing to a statement
The page describes a plan as covering this company's models alongside models from other makers. That is an acknowledgement that the menu is mixed, and it is not a commitment about any row on it.
Recorded plainly: the seller has told you the menu includes other people's work. Nothing follows from that about notice, succession or how long a particular licensed line stays purchasable.
3Two generations is a cushion with no stated depth
Having an older house line on sale gives a production somewhere to stand, the same arrangement recorded for Kling AI and LTX Studio. None of the three says how deep the cushion is.
Three entries reaching the same arrangement independently suggests it is a product habit rather than a policy anybody adopted. Habits change without announcements, which is why the column records them as menus.
- How the plan describes the menu it sellsPlans are described as covering Luma models alongside models from other makers
4A pipeline across model versions
Model end dates touch “Luma”; SceneMixer's guides describe how its pipeline treats the models it runs:
AI dubbing replaces the audio of a finished clip and then tries to match the lips. Native-language generation gives the video model the line in the target language before the shot exists, so mouth movement, pauses and shot length are produced for that language.
SceneMixer, Native-Language Dialogue vs. Dubbing in AI Video (2026): Why the Cast Should Speak the Line — “Is native-language generation the same as AI dubbing?” (read 2026-10-13)
Wan 3.0 is Alibaba Cloud's video generation model on the Model Studio platform, called through an asynchronous submit-then-poll API, in two tiers: the standard wan3.0-video and the faster wan3.0-video-prime.
SceneMixer, Wan 3.0 for AI Short Drama (2026): Parameters, Reference Limits, Moderation Rules and the 30-Second Take (read 2026-10-13)
5Sources
Read from the plans and pricing page on lumalabs.ai, 2026-09-22. The whole entry is on Luma, and the column it sits in is on Named replacement. Same column, other entries: Wan-AI, Pika.