Notice period: the warning nobody has promised
No application in this register has published a notice period. Three platforms that host other companies models have: one commits to at least 60 days for a generally available model and 30 for a preview, one to six months or 45 days depending on the model, and one promises advance notice without attaching a number to it. As of 2026-09-12.
| Entry | Notice period | What that leaves a production with |
|---|---|---|
| Amazon Bedrock | Six months or 45 days, stated per model in advance | Plus a date before which end-of-life cannot arrive |
| Microsoft Foundry | At least 60 days, or at least 30 for a preview model | Dates stated to be non-extendable |
| Gemini API | Advance notice promised, no number attached | The published date is the earliest a model might go |
| Sora | Nothing promised in advance | About five months elapsed between the two closures |
| LTX Studio | No period, but the right to replace models is written down | A statement that no period is owed |
| SceneMixer | Nothing published about notice before a tier changes | Named tiers make a change visible afterwards |
| Every other entry | Nothing published | No commitment in either direction |
Inclusion rule. A cell is filled from a page where the seller or the maker states what warning it will give. An interval observed after the fact is recorded in the detail column, never as a commitment. Order. Entries publishing a period in time units first, then the rest.
1Given is not the same as promised
One vendor left roughly five months between closing a consumer product and closing the interface behind it. That is a fact about a single retirement, recorded with the announcement it came from. It is not a commitment, and nothing in that notice suggests the interval was policy rather than a schedule that happened to land that way. A platform policy is the opposite: a number published before anything is scheduled, which is why the two are kept in different columns here.
Reading it as a norm is the error this column exists to prevent. One observation sets a floor on what is possible and says nothing about what is usual. The next retirement will either match it or show that it never meant anything.
2A clause about replacing models is a different kind of statement
One pricing page states that the models on offer may be updated, modified or replaced, and that continued availability of any particular model is not guaranteed. That is not a notice period; it is the reverse, an advance statement that no period is owed. It is recorded anyway, because a written statement can be designed around and a silence cannot.
A reader who knows the right exists will plan for a swap. A reader looking at a page that says nothing assumes a stability that was never on offer, and that is the more expensive of the two mistakes.
3Where this column does get filled, and by whom
Three entries state a period in time units, and all three sell to developers rather than to productions. Amazon Bedrock publishes a legacy window of six months or 45 days per model, plus a date before which end-of-life cannot happen at all. Microsoft Foundry publishes 60 days for a generally available model and 30 for a preview, and adds that dates are not extendable. The Gemini API promises advance notice and never counts it, which this register treats as unfilled.
That pattern is the finding rather than the numbers. A notice period appears wherever the buyer is expected to have written code against a named version, and disappears wherever the product is sold as a creative tool. A production reaching a model through an application is therefore two layers away from the only party that has committed to warn anybody, and the commitment does not travel down the chain.
4This column, entry by entry
The notice period column read one entry at a time, wherever that entry has published something here or falls silent in a way the others do not. Ordinary blanks stay on the table above.
- Microsoft Foundry — 60 days for a live model, 30 for a preview, and dates that cannot be moved
- Amazon Bedrock — a legacy window of six months or 45 days, stated on the model card in advance
- Gemini API — notice promised in words and never converted into a number of days
- LTX Studio — a written right to replace models, which is a statement that no period is owed
- SceneMixer — nothing published about warning, but a tier named precisely enough to audit afterwards
- Runway — a credit conversion table that can be edited, with nothing published about warning
- Sora — about five months between two closures, which is an interval given rather than promised
- Notice before a tier changesNo date announced (as of 2026-09-12)nothing published
- Published noticeThe pricing page reserves the right to update, modify or replace available models and does not guarantee continued availability of any specific modelthe only one of its kind here
- Sora API24 September 2026discontinued
- Notice for a generally available modelAt least 60 days before retirementsent to subscriptions with active deployments
- Notice for a preview modelAt least 30 days before retirementwhich is the stage sora-2 sits in
- Legacy periodSix months or 45 days, stated on each model cardwhich is the notice given before end-of-life
- How many days of advance noticeNo date announced (as of 2026-09-12)promised but never counted
5Sources
Values come from the page the entry is read on: vendor announcements for endings, app pages for menus, both linked from the calendar. What counts as a value is on sourcing. Read 2026-09-12. Other fields: Default tier, Lifecycle states. All of them: the field list.